ABSTRACT
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is used to treat patients with advanced malignant pheochromocytomas (PCCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs). Patients are at risk of a PRRT-induced catecholamine crisis, and standard guidelines regarding the prevention and management of infusion reactions are lacking. In this case series, the institutional experience of five sequential patients with metastatic PCCs and PGLs receiving PRRT on an outpatient basis is described, of which four had symptomatic tumors and three had a high burden of disease. All patients with symptomatic tumors were treated with preventive management prior to the initiation of PRRT, and no infusion reactions or catecholamine crises were documented. PRRT may be delivered safely on an outpatient basis for patients with metastatic PCCs and PGLs with the involvement of an interdisciplinary team.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms , Paraganglioma , Pheochromocytoma , HumansABSTRACT
Cardiac metastases are an infrequent site of metastasis in neuroendocrine tumors, and the treatment implications in the era of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are unclear. Potential safety concerns exist regarding cardiac integrity and function in response to PRRT. We describe our institutional experience with 4 patients with well-differentiated, midgut neuroendocrine tumors with cardiac involvement detected on Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scans who were treated with PRRT.
Subject(s)
Heart Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Heart Neoplasms/secondary , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Receptors, Peptide/metabolism , Female , Heart Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Heart Neoplasms/metabolism , Humans , Male , Organometallic Compounds , Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analog functional imaging with gallium-68 (Ga-68) dotatate positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has demonstrated superiority in lesion detection in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The clinical impact of this imaging modality on US surgical and medical oncology practices has not been established. METHODS: Consecutive patients with NET at our institution who received an initial Ga-68 dotatate PET/CT between July 2017 and September 2018 were included. Ga-68 dotatate PET/CT was compared with prior imaging. RESULTS: Among 101 eligible patients, 51 of 50 were female/male, site of origin was gastroenteropancreatic (75%), unknown primary (13%), lung (8%), thymus (2%), and other (2%). All NETs were histologically well/moderately differentiated. Ga-68 dotatate imaging findings altered management in 36 (35.6%) patients: documentation of progression led to the initiation of systemic therapy in 14 patients, obviated the need for biopsy in four patients, and altered surgical plans in 7 of 14 (50%) patients referred for surgery. In 11 patients, decisions regarding peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy and somatostatin analogs were altered. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, Ga-68 dotatate PET/CT altered diagnosis and management in one-third of patients and changed operative plans in half of the patients who were referred for surgical evaluation. These results support the routine use of this imaging in the care of patients with early-stage and advanced NETs.
